Before August passes too far into the past, it is worth noting that last month was the 220th anniversary of the beginning of the Haitian Revolution on August 21, 1791. On that date, the slaves in the French Caribbean colony of Saint Domingue rose up in a bloody slave revolt turned revolution that ended in 1804 with the emergence of an independent Haiti ruled by an African-descended elite.
Haiti’s revolution is significant not only because it was the sole major slave revolt to succeed in the history of African slavery in the Americas, but also because of its considerable influence on slavery in the United States. The events in Haiti, along with the rise of King Cotton, reinvigorated slavery in the American South. The accounts of thousands of whites massacred on Saint Domingue, bolstered by slave conspiracies in the 19th-century South, especially Nat Turner’s revolt in 1831, convinced many white Southerners that freed slaves would turn on their owners and other whites in an orgy of barbaric vengeance and hence must be kept enslaved to prevent bloody anarchy. Thomas Jefferson, himself a slaveholder, eloquently expressed this dilemma in 1820 when he wrote of the slaves “we have the wolf by the ear, and we can neither hold him, nor safely let him go.”
So white Southerners were afraid of their slaves, but feared emancipation even more. Which helps explain their vehemence in resisting even the slightest threat to peculiar institution’s survival and the final decision for secession. Abraham Lincoln’s election in the minds of many slaveholders brought the specter of Saint Domingue so close that safety only seemed possible by secession to preserve the institution that kept the slaves in check.
As blood and treasure though increasingly were expended in the American Civil War, more white Americans in the North warmed to the idea of emancipation, but like white Southerners still feared the consequences. Their fear can be described in a question asked in the New York Times on September 6, 1861–to wit, “What Shall be Done with the Slaves?” The question came from a letter to the paper from J. B. Lyon of Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. Lyon wrote:
Lyon did not share these fears seeing the British emancipation of its Caribbean slaves in the 1830s as proof the process could be peaceful. He wrote:
Increasingly, over the rest of 1861 and 1862, more and more white Northerners would adopt a position similar to the J. B. Lyon. That is, for the Civil War to have a proper resolution and to prevent a similar conflict in the future, slavery had to end. Still, for many of these people, the specter of Haiti would stay powerful and do much to explain the sentiment in the North that colonization of freed slaves abroad must accompany emancipation. Abraham Lincoln himself promoted the idea of colonization during the Civil War, skeptical that whites and freed blacks peacefully could live together. Lincoln and colonization will be dealt with in future issues of Civil War Emancipation.
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/1861/09/06/news/what-shall-be-done-with-the-slaves.html
Nicely timed. This morning when your post came, I was preparing a qualifying exam question for my phd that deals with globalizing the teaching of U.S. chattel slavery. Thanks for the nudge in the right direction!
Hi Daniel. Ah, I remember preparing for my Ph.D. exams–glad I could help! And good luck.
Don Shaffer