Lincoln’s Polite Letter

While ostensibly aimed at the State of Missouri, Gen. John Frémont’s martial law proclamation electrified the nation. Here was an army general taking bold action relevant to the basic cause of the war. It especially caused a reaction in the White House, where President Abraham Lincoln was alarmed. After the time spent during Summer 1861 placating aggrieved Unionist slaveholders in the Border States, especially in strategic Maryland, which had lost slaves to Union army units camped in the state, Frémont’s proclamation threatened to sabotage all of Lincoln’s careful work (see the July 1o and August 14 editions of Civil War Emancipation). By ordering freedom for the slaves of disloyal owners in Missouri, Frémont called into question for Southern Unionists the Lincoln administration’s sincerity in asserting that it intended to respect the property rights of loyal slaveholders.

So Lincoln quickly penned a letter to Gen. Frémont which read:

Major-General FRÉMONT.

MY DEAR SIR: Two points in your proclamation of August 30 give me some anxiety:

First. Should you shoot a man according to the proclamation the Confederates would very certainly shoot our best men in their hands in retaliation; and so man for man indefinitely. It is therefore my order that you allow no man to be shot under the proclamation without first having my approbation or consent.

Second. I think there is great danger that the closing paragraph in relation to the confiscation of property and the liberating slaves of traitorous owners will alarm our southern Union friends and turn them against us, perhaps ruin our rather fair prospect for Kentucky. Allow me therefore to ask that you will as of your own motion modify that paragraph so as to conform to the first and fourth sections of the act of Congress entitled “An act to confiscate property used for insurrectionary purposes,” approved August 6, 1861, and a copy of which act I herewith send you.

This letter is written in a spirit of caution and not of censure. I send it by special messenger in order that it may certainly and speedily reach you.

Yours, very truly,


While concerned about Confederate retaliation with Union prisoners should Frémont execute rebel guerillas in Missouri, clearly Abraham Lincoln’s bigger concern was the general’s decision to free their slaves. Lincoln had only reluctantly signed the Confiscation Act in early August, which he feared would convince heretofore loyal slaveholders that the government intended to seize their people next. To Lincoln, the best response politically was quietly and quickly to get Frémont to retract the objectionable sections of his martial law proclamation. Unfortunately for Lincoln it would take more than a polite letter to get Frémont to back down.

One day, Abraham Lincoln would prove even more stubborn in defending his own proclamation of freedom for the slaves. But September 2, 1861, was not yet that day. The future Great Emancipator for what he believed were sound political and strategic reasons aimed at saving the Union was still defending the old order.


About Donald R. Shaffer

Donald R. Shaffer is the author of _After the Glory: The Struggles of Black Civil War Veterans_ (Kansas, 2004), which won the Peter Seaborg Award for Civil War Scholarship in 2005. More recently he published (with Elizabeth Regosin), _Voices of Emancipation: Understanding Slavery, the Civil War, and Reconstruction through the U.S. Pension Bureau Files_ (2008). Dr. Shaffer teaches online exclusively (i.e., a virtual professor). He lives in Arizona and can be contacted at
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Lincoln’s Polite Letter

  1. Kurt Knierim says:

    This postadds some wonderful context to Lincoln’s letter to O.H. Browning on Sept 22 where he states, “I think to lose Kentucky is nearly the same as to lose the whole game. Kentucky gone, we can not hold Missouri, nor, as I think, Maryland.” Thanks for the post.

    • Hi Kurt. Great to hear from you. A wonderful quote I’ve read before. Most of Lincoln’s actions early in the Civil War, especially in regard to emancipation, need to be understood in the context of keeping the loyal Border States in the Union.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s