Explaining why slaves fled their owners during the Civil War seemingly is easy. With the approach of Union forces, they saw a chance to be free and took it. However, it is also useful in comprehending the slaves’ motives to understand what they were fleeing from. Among the what became clearer to northern troops as they moved into slave territory. They began to encounter the infrastructure of coercion and punishment that underlay and propped up the peculiar institution.
In the June 29, 1861 edition of Harper’s Weekly, there appeared an illustration titled, “WHIPPING-POST ON THE PREMISES OF MR. WEST AT NEWPORT NEWS, VA. SKETCHED BY OUR, SPECIAL ARTIST.”
Source: http://www.sonofthesouth.net/leefoundation/civil-war/1861/june/slave-whipping-post.htm
The unnamed artist who drew the illustration wrote:
This matter-of-fact description was no doubt the best possible in a family friendly illustrated newspaper like Harper’s Weekly. But more explicit depictions were recorded of the violence visited on slaves. One example comes from the Baton Rouge, Louisiana, of a slave named Peter who was photographed in April 1863. While Peter’s example is probably extreme, many slaves bore the scars of whippings.
Source: http://www.ourarchives.wikispaces.net/DTCW2
Given the horrors of slavery, the enthusiasm of the contraband slaves at Fortress Monroe in June 1861 makes all the more sense. They were glad to be away from the slaveholders’ punishments and abuse, and eager to please Union troops both to strike a blow at their owners and to discourage the Northerners from sending back into slavery. A correspondent of the New York Times wrote on June 25, 1861 about the Fortress Monroe contraband:
So as early as June 1861, Union forces were finding African-American slaves to be useful. While they limited their role, the contraband slaves for the time being were content, because within Union lines they had sanctuary from terrors–like whipping–inflicted on them by slaveholders.
This is the best article about the Civil War that I have seen in the whole 150th whizbang.
I am eager to read your books and to communicate my small findings about Black Civil War Veterans.
Hi Jean. Glad you like my post and I hope you like my book as well. 🙂
Good post, but I have to admit to being completely disturbed by the often circulated photograph of the wounded slave. Within this rhetorical context and given your message, I would not say that the photo is inappropriate. However, I could not look at it and therefore couldn’t concentrate as I would like to have on your words.
Hi Alisea. You make a valid point. I wanted make my point powerfully and therefore the use of the photo was appropriate. Slavery was a cruel system and the photo makes that point well. I certainly didn’t use it gratuitously.
I have to admit I was drawn by this most grotesque photo as for the first time I saw a name and could know his story…
what struck me about Col. Butler’s comment is it betrays a level racism that is implicit and may be a clue as to what attitudes are extant even among those on the side of “emancipation” as it were. What I mean is, I would have thought they were already masters of manual labor and equal to any task after a lifetime of toil and hard graft. If it was Olympic weight lifting how would the Marines do against the champions?
It seems that in the mind of the Col. we see the essence of the idea that, ‘blacks have to work at least twice as hard to be seen as equal to whites’ whatever the truth of that phrase we have all heard it somewhere. Granted the good Col may have preconceptions based on observations of depressed and emaciated slaves doing as little as they can except to avoid the lash and obviously “John Brown” was nowhere to be seen.
That it must be the idea of emancipation that makes them almost as good at digging than white soldiers is nowhere near as generous of spirit an ‘observation’ in the circumstances as Id like. Maybe it is a clue as to why there was the need for Mr X & Dr King more than a hundred years later…