While events at Fortress Monroe riveted public attention during Summer/Fall 1861, as slaves fled there in a bold bid for freedom, at the same time an unheralded wave of even more desperate Virginia slaves escaped to an even riskier destination–the U.S. Navy’s Atlantic Blocking Squadron.
The Navy had established the Atlantic Blocking Squadron after the fall of Fort Sumter to implement a naval blockade of southern ports. Making the blockade effective often meant having ships operate close to shore, close enough that slaves noted their presence and, like those in the vicinity of Fortress Monroe, began to plot their escape to what they hoped would be the protection of Union forces and freedom. As noted in the July 15 edition of Civil War Emancipation, on that date 150 years before the USS Mount Vernon picked up a group of slaves that had stolen a boat and made their way to a light house off the mouth of the Rappahannock River. They reported the murder of a Unionist by Confederate vigilantes near where they lived and that local authorities planned to send slaves into the front of the battle line as cannon fodder.
Silas Stringham, the commander of the Atlantic Blocking Squadron, expressed skepticism of slaves’ claims, especially their fear of death should they be returned to their owners. But like Benjamin Butler before, Stringham recognized their value to the enemy. On July 18, he wrote Navy Secretary Gideon Welles, stating “If negroes are to be used in this contest, I have no hesitation in saying they should be used to preserve the Government, not to destroy it.“
Even before Stringham wrote Welles, the commander of the USS Mount Vernon, Oliver Glisson, reported on July 17, he had picked up three more slaves, also claiming they would be killed if they were returned. Secretary Welles finally provided guidance on July 22 approving using the escaped slaves as navy laborers. He wrote Stringham:
Within a month, what ostensibly began as a humanitarian gesture, soon became something more, as navy authorities began to plot to take advantage of opportunities to deprive the Confederates of slave labor. On August 3, Welles wrote Stringham with some potentially valuable intelligence. He stated:
Over two weeks later, on August 20, Oliver Glisson, from his post off the mouth of Rappahannock, provided fresh intelligence suggesting Nicholson’s report was unreliable. He stated:
Evidently, some of the slaves escaping to the Atlantic Blocking Squadron shaped their stories, in the hopes of ingratiating themselves with U.S. Navy personnel, so they would not be returned to their rebel owners. The exodus, although never on the scale occurring around Fortress Monroe, and involving almost exclusively male slaves, continued into Fall 1861 and resulted on September 25, 1861, (as described in the September 22 edition of Civil War Emancipation) in the formalizing of the recruitment of contraband slaves into Navy ranks.
The exodus proved an irritation to slaveholders in Virginia, who told their slaves stories of their own. A Massachusetts newspaper reported in late September that slaves escaping by water were saying:
White Virginians also could not credit the slaves as fleeing on their own initiative, but instead convinced themselves they left as a result of Yankee blandishments. An October 15 letter from a correspondent near Norfolk published in the Richmond Daily Dispatch read:
Of course, the paper’s correspondent could not acknowledge that real reason the slaves fled by water to U.S. Navy ships was their desire to be free. And that the wish was so strong, these slaves took a considerable risk not only in escaping their plantations but embarking out on the open water sometimes far from shore often in small flimsy boats unsure if they would encounter a northern ship or even if they found one that they would find the sanctuary they sought. Yet so strong was their desire to be free that they literally would risk their lives to reach the ships of the Atlantic Blocking Squadron.
Sources: 1)
http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/m/moawar//text/ofre0006.txt
; 2)
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2006.05.0299
; 3)
http://www.rmlonline.org/civil%20war%20news/Sep22-28-1861.htm
.