<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sometimes The Civil War Wasn&#8217;t About Slavery (Well Sort Of)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/sometimes-the-civilwar-wasnt-about-slavery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/sometimes-the-civilwar-wasnt-about-slavery/</link>
	<description>remembering freedom for the slaves ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonardo</title>
		<link>http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/sometimes-the-civilwar-wasnt-about-slavery/#comment-1621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leonardo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 20:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/?p=469#comment-1621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty interesting ,if obscure  part of southwest history. From what  I know about this era in AZ history, confederate aligned militias (including the earliest incarnation of the Arizona rangers), were fighting apaches and bandits before the union California column drove the rebels out in the summer of &#039;62. From there, the bloody apache wars would expand and be waged until the surrender of Geronimo in 1886.It was a tragic and wild era of this region.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty interesting ,if obscure  part of southwest history. From what  I know about this era in AZ history, confederate aligned militias (including the earliest incarnation of the Arizona rangers), were fighting apaches and bandits before the union California column drove the rebels out in the summer of &#8217;62. From there, the bloody apache wars would expand and be waged until the surrender of Geronimo in 1886.It was a tragic and wild era of this region.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think About It</title>
		<link>http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/sometimes-the-civilwar-wasnt-about-slavery/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Think About It]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 18:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/?p=469#comment-858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clarke:
 It would be impossible for whites to have paid a bigger price for slavery than African-Americans considering the centuries of enslavement, of being used as farm equipment and living in conditions one today wouldn&#039;t want to see an animal living in, which no one can put a price on as well as the countless deaths on the infamous Middle Passage. Why do you think slave traders licked the skin of prospective slaves in Africa to see if they retained enough salt to survive the Middle Passage? Because it was that arduous of a journey and many, many died along the way. 

Secondly, though anyone with any understanding of American history realizes that slavery, specifically its extension into the western territories stolen from Mexico or its non-extension, was the underlying root cause of secession and civil war it is a virtual certainty that exceedingly few white Union soldiers fought and died to end the institution. The overriding goal was to reunite the country under the federal government, not to end slavery. The north was extremely racist itself. A huge amount of white northern workers were terrified of the prospect of free black men competing with them for scarce jobs. The &quot;Free-Soilers&quot; in the midwest abhorred slavery... because it would present unfair competition to their small family farms. If believing that slavery has to be abolished come Hell or high water was a requirement for serving in the Union army it would have been a very small army indeed. Don&#039;t be deluded into thinking that the end result was the motivation for enlistment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarke:<br />
 It would be impossible for whites to have paid a bigger price for slavery than African-Americans considering the centuries of enslavement, of being used as farm equipment and living in conditions one today wouldn&#8217;t want to see an animal living in, which no one can put a price on as well as the countless deaths on the infamous Middle Passage. Why do you think slave traders licked the skin of prospective slaves in Africa to see if they retained enough salt to survive the Middle Passage? Because it was that arduous of a journey and many, many died along the way. </p>
<p>Secondly, though anyone with any understanding of American history realizes that slavery, specifically its extension into the western territories stolen from Mexico or its non-extension, was the underlying root cause of secession and civil war it is a virtual certainty that exceedingly few white Union soldiers fought and died to end the institution. The overriding goal was to reunite the country under the federal government, not to end slavery. The north was extremely racist itself. A huge amount of white northern workers were terrified of the prospect of free black men competing with them for scarce jobs. The &#8220;Free-Soilers&#8221; in the midwest abhorred slavery&#8230; because it would present unfair competition to their small family farms. If believing that slavery has to be abolished come Hell or high water was a requirement for serving in the Union army it would have been a very small army indeed. Don&#8217;t be deluded into thinking that the end result was the motivation for enlistment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald R. Shaffer</title>
		<link>http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/sometimes-the-civilwar-wasnt-about-slavery/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald R. Shaffer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/?p=469#comment-305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Clarke. My point in this blog post was limited to the situation in New Mexico Territory (which includes present-day Arizona and New Mexico). Plus, a million white men didn&#039;t die in the Civil War. The current accepted estimate is 620,000 deaths, although some scholars are now pushing for the figure to be revised higher (see the Disunion blog in the New York Times). Plus, whatever the figure, proportionately more African-American soldiers died in the Civil War. The vast majority of Civil War deaths were due to disease, and since conditions in the camps of black Union troops were worse than for white soldiers and the quality of medical care poorer, this fact shouldn&#039;t be surprising. So proportionately black troops paid their share of the butcher&#039;s bill for ending slavery and more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Clarke. My point in this blog post was limited to the situation in New Mexico Territory (which includes present-day Arizona and New Mexico). Plus, a million white men didn&#8217;t die in the Civil War. The current accepted estimate is 620,000 deaths, although some scholars are now pushing for the figure to be revised higher (see the Disunion blog in the New York Times). Plus, whatever the figure, proportionately more African-American soldiers died in the Civil War. The vast majority of Civil War deaths were due to disease, and since conditions in the camps of black Union troops were worse than for white soldiers and the quality of medical care poorer, this fact shouldn&#8217;t be surprising. So proportionately black troops paid their share of the butcher&#8217;s bill for ending slavery and more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarke Kallinen</title>
		<link>http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/sometimes-the-civilwar-wasnt-about-slavery/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clarke Kallinen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/?p=469#comment-304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Civil War was about slavery, then a million white men lost their lives because of slavery. In other words: whites paid a bigger price than blacks for the institution of slavery. Talk about politically incorrect! Of course you’re not allowed to say any such thing — never mind that it’s true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Civil War was about slavery, then a million white men lost their lives because of slavery. In other words: whites paid a bigger price than blacks for the institution of slavery. Talk about politically incorrect! Of course you’re not allowed to say any such thing — never mind that it’s true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
