<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Montgomery Convention Considers the African Slave Trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/the-montgomery-convention-considers-the-african-slave-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/the-montgomery-convention-considers-the-african-slave-trade/</link>
	<description>remembering freedom for the slaves ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 02:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin Thompson</title>
		<link>http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/the-montgomery-convention-considers-the-african-slave-trade/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edwin Thompson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/?p=306#comment-61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the history lesson.  I came to your link via the NYTimes Disunion.  I like the way you wrote the last paragraph.  To me, it sounds like the new confederacy were politically savvy children, knowing that their actions regarding African slavery were wrong, yet trying to maximize their chances of successfully maintaining this institution by not creating trouble with Great Britain.  I’m still amazed that so many people would go and fight for such a cuase; but those were different times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the history lesson.  I came to your link via the NYTimes Disunion.  I like the way you wrote the last paragraph.  To me, it sounds like the new confederacy were politically savvy children, knowing that their actions regarding African slavery were wrong, yet trying to maximize their chances of successfully maintaining this institution by not creating trouble with Great Britain.  I’m still amazed that so many people would go and fight for such a cuase; but those were different times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
