<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Secession and Slavery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/texas-secession-and-slavery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/texas-secession-and-slavery/</link>
	<description>remembering freedom for the slaves ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 02:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Shaffer</title>
		<link>http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/texas-secession-and-slavery/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Shaffer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mark.  You&#039;re correct that the expansion of slavery is an important issue.  The position of many white Southerners by 1860 was without the ability to expand, slavery would slowly wither and die, and emancipation would unleash a bloody race war.  That is why bnorthern reassurances of non-interference with slavery were insufficient in late 1860/early 1861 to forestall secession.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark.  You&#8217;re correct that the expansion of slavery is an important issue.  The position of many white Southerners by 1860 was without the ability to expand, slavery would slowly wither and die, and emancipation would unleash a bloody race war.  That is why bnorthern reassurances of non-interference with slavery were insufficient in late 1860/early 1861 to forestall secession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/texas-secession-and-slavery/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very true  -- there are all kinds of documents, speeches, articles,  where the South bragged,boasted, and shouted  that  their whole point was slavery.

Not just slavery but  the SPREAD of slavery.    This  is a major distinction we don&#039;t grasp today, but everyone grasped it then.   The South did not  fight  to protect slaver -- utter  nonsense.   They fought to SPREAD slavery, and spread it against  the wishes of the people.

See  the amazing  Southern Ultimatums -- Five  Ultimatums issued by Southern leaders in Montgomery, in March of 1861.    These Ultimatums were reported in newspapers North and South  -- for  example, the RIchmond paper  headlines about the Ultimatums read &quot;THE TRUE  ISSUE&quot;

ALL five Southern Ultimatums were about the same thing -- the SPREAD of slavery.    The SPREAD of slavery against the will of  the people.

SPecifically, the  First Ultimatum was that slavery be spread in  the territories -- they meant, of  course, Kansas.   Kansas had just  voted 98% to 2 % to keep slavery out forever.     But that  didn&#039;t even slow the Southern leaders down -- their first ultimatum was that Slavery MUST be spread there, and the US Congress  must do the spreading!

This is a total repudiation of the  fig leaf of &quot;state&#039;s rights&quot;-- once Kansas rejected slavery, the Southern leaders were in a quandry.   What do we do now?  We have lied to people and said we only wanted what the white people wanted.     Well, Kansas just said NO, in a major way.  

Toombs shouted &quot;EXPAND OR PERISH&quot;  he meant expand  slavery or perish.    The  Ultimatums were all about the  spread  of slavery -- states  had no rights  to decide anything  about any slave issue, according to the Southern Ultimatums.

These  ultimatums were  not the drunken reckless radicals-- these were the considered, and decades long demands of the South.    And the Southern newspapers said so.   They said these were the  demands  we have always made!  

These were the demands in 1820, when the  South then promised violence if they could not spread slavery.      The &quot;Compromise&quot; of  1820 was about as  much compromise as a 7-11 armed robbery.     And the  South knew it.  In 1850, the South wanted to spread slavery again -- they weren&#039;t satisfied with the robber spoils from 1820.   Once again, they demanded the spread of slavery. Once again, we tried to clean it up and call it a &quot;Compromise&quot;.   

By 1861, the South wanted  even more, not content to push slavery where they had said before.  Now they wanted the territories that had rejected slavery -- rejected slavery overwhelmingly.    

And that was what their Ultimatums were all about: the SPREAD of slavery against the wishes of the people.

Every US history text book in schools should have three documents. One, the  Declaration of Independence.   Two, the Southern Ultimatums to spread slavery.  And three, Lincoln&#039;s Gettysburg address.

Each are that important.   

If the South had won the Civil War, they would have put these Ultimatums in every class room.  They would have had their children memorize the Ultimatums to spread slavery.    But they lost.   So they have done everything possible to cover this crazy aspect of their history.  

What their leaders demanded, what their newspapers shouted out with pride, they dare not even mention to this day.  Its been 150 years, and they are still terrified of their own statements, their own demands, their own Ultimatums.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true  &#8212; there are all kinds of documents, speeches, articles,  where the South bragged,boasted, and shouted  that  their whole point was slavery.</p>
<p>Not just slavery but  the SPREAD of slavery.    This  is a major distinction we don&#8217;t grasp today, but everyone grasped it then.   The South did not  fight  to protect slaver &#8212; utter  nonsense.   They fought to SPREAD slavery, and spread it against  the wishes of the people.</p>
<p>See  the amazing  Southern Ultimatums &#8212; Five  Ultimatums issued by Southern leaders in Montgomery, in March of 1861.    These Ultimatums were reported in newspapers North and South  &#8212; for  example, the RIchmond paper  headlines about the Ultimatums read &#8220;THE TRUE  ISSUE&#8221;</p>
<p>ALL five Southern Ultimatums were about the same thing &#8212; the SPREAD of slavery.    The SPREAD of slavery against the will of  the people.</p>
<p>SPecifically, the  First Ultimatum was that slavery be spread in  the territories &#8212; they meant, of  course, Kansas.   Kansas had just  voted 98% to 2 % to keep slavery out forever.     But that  didn&#8217;t even slow the Southern leaders down &#8212; their first ultimatum was that Slavery MUST be spread there, and the US Congress  must do the spreading!</p>
<p>This is a total repudiation of the  fig leaf of &#8220;state&#8217;s rights&#8221;&#8211; once Kansas rejected slavery, the Southern leaders were in a quandry.   What do we do now?  We have lied to people and said we only wanted what the white people wanted.     Well, Kansas just said NO, in a major way.  </p>
<p>Toombs shouted &#8220;EXPAND OR PERISH&#8221;  he meant expand  slavery or perish.    The  Ultimatums were all about the  spread  of slavery &#8212; states  had no rights  to decide anything  about any slave issue, according to the Southern Ultimatums.</p>
<p>These  ultimatums were  not the drunken reckless radicals&#8211; these were the considered, and decades long demands of the South.    And the Southern newspapers said so.   They said these were the  demands  we have always made!  </p>
<p>These were the demands in 1820, when the  South then promised violence if they could not spread slavery.      The &#8220;Compromise&#8221; of  1820 was about as  much compromise as a 7-11 armed robbery.     And the  South knew it.  In 1850, the South wanted to spread slavery again &#8212; they weren&#8217;t satisfied with the robber spoils from 1820.   Once again, they demanded the spread of slavery. Once again, we tried to clean it up and call it a &#8220;Compromise&#8221;.   </p>
<p>By 1861, the South wanted  even more, not content to push slavery where they had said before.  Now they wanted the territories that had rejected slavery &#8212; rejected slavery overwhelmingly.    </p>
<p>And that was what their Ultimatums were all about: the SPREAD of slavery against the wishes of the people.</p>
<p>Every US history text book in schools should have three documents. One, the  Declaration of Independence.   Two, the Southern Ultimatums to spread slavery.  And three, Lincoln&#8217;s Gettysburg address.</p>
<p>Each are that important.   </p>
<p>If the South had won the Civil War, they would have put these Ultimatums in every class room.  They would have had their children memorize the Ultimatums to spread slavery.    But they lost.   So they have done everything possible to cover this crazy aspect of their history.  </p>
<p>What their leaders demanded, what their newspapers shouted out with pride, they dare not even mention to this day.  Its been 150 years, and they are still terrified of their own statements, their own demands, their own Ultimatums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
